IN URBAN TRANSIT VEHICLES

INTRODUCTION
The urban transit market was established as a priority for us because it is the first major diesel market segment where we have a specific aim to reduce particulate matter in the exhaust and the smell for customers.

Information collected during assessment of the urban bus market overseas indicated that new clean air regulations would create a marketing opportunity for B100 blends. Economic work completed by the market research firm, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, supported the conclusion that B100 blends (in B20 form (20% B100 mixed with 80% petroleum diesel)) were competitive with other alternative fuels that transit companies may consider. Other research was completed to verify that emissions reductions could be achieved and engine performance was similar to diesel.

Because B100 is the only alternative fuel that can be tested prior to conversion, a series of short-term demonstrations with transit operators throughout the U.S. were conducted. Surveys with transit property officials about their intentions to use B100 resulted in approximately 20 percent said they consider B100 the top alternative fuel choice and approximately 50 percent were impressed with the prospects for B100. The US EPA has certified a 20% blend of B100 used in conjunction with an oxidation catalyst as a compliance tool to meet new clean air regulations in the U.S..

WHAT IS B100?
B100 is a diesel fuel substitute produced from renewable sources such as vegetable oils. B100 has been registered with WorkSafe Australia and the US Environmental Protection Agency as a pure fuel or as a fuel additive and is a legal fuel for commerce. B100 is an alternative fuel which can be used in neat form, or blended with petroleum diesel for use in compression ignition (diesel) engines. Its physical and chemical properties as it relates to operation of diesel engines are similar to petroleum based diesel fuel. The specification for pure (100%) B100 is described in Table 1†.

Table 1. B100 Specifications (as of July, 2000).

Property

ASTM Method

Value

Unit

Flash Point

D93

100.0 min.

oC

Water & Sediment

D1796

0.050 max.

vol. %

Carbon Residue (100% sample)

D4530‡

0.050 max

wt %

Sulfated Ash

D874

0.020 max.

wt %

Viscosity @ 40ûC

D445

1.9 - 6.0

Cst

Sulfur

D2622

0.01 max.

wt %

Cetane Number

D613

45 min.

 

Cloud Point

D2500

by customer

oC

Copper Strip Corrosion

D130

No. 3b max.

mg KOH/gm

Acid Number

D664

0.80 max

 

Free Glycerin

G.C.§

0.020 max.

wt %

Total Glycerin

G.C.§

0.240 max.

wt %

† This specification is in the process of being evaluated by
ASTM. A considerable amount of experience exists in the US with
a 20% blend of B100 with 80% petroleum based diesel.

‡ Or equivalent ASTM testing method.

§ Austrian (Christiana Planc) update of USDA test method.

RATIOS IN URBAN TRANSIT VEHICLES
Blend Ratio: minimum 19 percent and maximum 21 percent by volume B100.

Table 2.
Certified Configurations and Particulate Matter Certification Levels

Engine Model

Model Year

Equipment Configuration

 

 

B20, Cat + stock timing

B20, Cat + retard (1)

6V92TA MUI

79-87

0.29

0.38

6V92TA MUI

88-89

0.18

0.23

6V92TA DDEC I

86-87

0.16

0.18

6V92TA DDEC II

88-89

0.17

0.19

6V92TA DDEC II

90-91

not certified

0.19

6V92TA DDEC II

92-93

not certified

0.15

6V71N MUI

73-87

0.29

0.38

6V71N MUI

88-89

0.29

0.38

6V71N MUI

85-86

0.29

0.38

8V71N MUI

73-84

0.29

0.38

6L71TA MUI

90

not certified

not certified

6L71TA MUI

88-89

0.18

0.23

6L71TA DDEC

90-91

0.16

0.18

(1) Up to and including four (4) degrees fuel injection retard
for MUI engines, and one (1) degree retard for DDEC engines.

We have been given on the 1st September 2000, a list of 16 engines provided by
Caterpillar in which B100 can be used

FLEET ECONOMIC AND PERFORMANCE
IMPLICATIONS OF B100 USE

Fleet Economics

B100 in Australia will be marketed at a premium compared to petroleum diesel. Therefore, fuel costs are greater than petroleum diesel for fleet managers that use a B100 blend. Although B100 is more expensive in Australia on a per litre basis, there are no significant infrastructure changes or incremental maintenance costs associated with its use. This contrasts to the significant capital investments that must be made in vehicle modifications and fueling infrastructure for other alternative fuels (CNG, LPG, Methanol). Three independent studies have confirmed that B100 blends (i.e. B20) are cost competitive with other alternative fuel options when compared on a vehicle life cycle basis.

A study completed by the University of Georgia provided a cost comparison for operating a transit fleet on three different alternative fuels (B100 blends, compressed natural gas, and methanol). Utilizing a 5% discount rate, the present value per bus per mile was calculated for the total cost of a transit fleet over an expected 30 year life cycle. Diesel buses had the lowest cost per mile (24.7¢). Costs for B100 blends ranged from 37.5 to 42¢ per mile. Compressed natural gas costs varied from 37.5 to 42 cents per mile, while methanol’s cost was 73.6¢ per mile. This study indicated that B100 blends have the potential to compete with CNG and methanol as fuels for urban fleets.

Similar conclusions have been reached by urban transit managers. Bi-State Development Agency is the transit authority in the City of St. Louis, MO which operates over 700 buses that consume over 22.7 million litres of diesel fuel annually. Lyle Howard, Quality Assurance Manager for Bi-State, has documented the advantages and disadvantages of various alternative fuels. Bi-State has used B20 for two years in a documented research program. Conclusions from that work include:

  • B100 is a viable motor fuel
  • performance and fuel economy were unchanged with B20
  • exhaust emission improved dramatically
  • the fuel was fully compatible with vehicle and fuel dispensing equipment.

    Mr. Howard compared alternative fuels on the following evaluation criteria; vehicle cost, infrastructure cost, safety, operating cost, reliability, customer acceptance, funding assistance, training costs, fuel availability, fuel quality, and fuel price stability. Fuels were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being most desirable. The following table compares B20 with diesel fuel, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, methanol, and ethanol.

    Table 3.

     

    Diesel

    CNG

    LNG

    Methanol

    Ethanol

    B20

    Vehicle Cost

    10

    5

    5

    5

    5

    10

    Infrastructure Cost

    10

    2

    5

    5

    5

    10

    Safety

    7

    4

    3

    1

    3

    8

    Operating Range

    10

    5

    10

    10

    10

    10

    Operating Cost

    10

    5

    7

    5

    5

    7

    Reliability

    10

    7

    5

    3

    3

    10

    Customer Accept

    5

    8

    8

    8

    9

    8

    Funds Assistance

    1

    10

    2

    0

    2

    2

    Training Costs

    10

    5

    5

    5

    5

    10

    Fuel Availability

    10

    10

    5

    5

    5

    6

    Fuel Quality

    9

    5

    10

    8

    8

    9

    Price Stability

    6

    8

    8

    6

    6

    6

    TOTALS

    98

    74

    73

    61

    66

    96

    Vehicle Performance
    Emissions and performance data on several medium and heavy duty engine families fueled with B20, including the Detroit Diesel Series 60, 6V-71, 6V-92, 8V-71, Cummins L10, Cummins 5.9 B, and the Navistar 7.3 HEUI. Emissions data from these tests demonstrate that particulate matter, opacity, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons are reduced. Oxides of nitrogen are slightly increased with some engines. Operating performance parameters, such as fuel consumption, power, and torque were similar to diesel fuel for these tests.

    CONSIDERATIONS FOR B100 USE
    Infrastructure

    In general, the standard storage and handling procedures used for petroleum diesel should be used for B100. The fuel should be stored in a clean, dry, dark environment. Temperature extremes should be avoided. Acceptable storage tank materials include mild steel, stainless steel, fluorinated polyethylene, and fluorinated polypropylene. B100 has a solvent effect which releases the deposits accumulated on tank walls and pipes, which previously have been used for diesel. These deposits can be expected to clog filters initially and precautions should be taken to allow for this.

    Materials Compatibility
    B100 over time will soften and degrade certain types of elastomers and natural rubber compounds. Precautions are needed when using high percent blends to ensure that the existing fueling system, primarily fuel hoses and fuel pump seals, do not contain elastomer compounds incompatible with B100. Manufacturers recommend that natural or butyl rubbers not be allowed to come in contact with neat B100. B100 will lead to degradation of these materials. If a vehicle's fuel system does contain these materials, replacement with B100 compatible elastomers such as Viton® B is recommended. The recent switch to low sulfur diesel fuel has caused most original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to switch to components suitable for use with B100, but users should contact their OEM for specific information. (Viton B is a registered trademark of DuPont Dow Elastomers.)

    Cold Flow Properties
    As with any diesel fuel, cold flow properties are important. A 20% blend of B100 will increase the cold flow properties (cold filter plugging point, cloud point, pour point) of petrodiesel approximately 1 to 3 degrees Celsius. Thus far, no precautions have been needed for fueling with 20% blends. Operation of neat (100%) B100 in cold weather, however, will experience gelling faster than petrodiesel. The solutions for this potential issue are much the same as that with low-sulfur diesel (i.e. utilization of fuel heaters and storage of the vehicle in or near a building). B100 appears to be largely unaffected by conventional pour point depressants.

    B100 ATTRIBUTES
    Emissions Reductions

    The use of B100 in a conventional diesel engine results in substantial reduction of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. Emissions of nitrogen oxides are either slightly reduced or slightly increased depending on the duty cycle and testing methods. Particulate emissions from conventional diesel engines can be divided into three components. Each component is present in varying degrees depending on fuel properties, engine design and operating parameters.

    The first component, and the one most closely related to the visible smoke often associated with diesel exhaust, is the carbonaceous material. This material is in the form of sub-micron sized carbon particles which are formed during the diesel combustion process and is especially prevalent under conditions when the fuel-air ratio is overly rich. This can occur as a result of insufficient combustion air, overfueling or poor in-cylinder fuel-air mixing. The second component is hydrocarbon material which is absorbed on the carbon particles, commonly referred to as the soluble fraction. A portion of this material is the result of incomplete combustion of the fuel, and the remainder is derived from the engine lube oil. Finally, the third particulate component is comprised of sulfates and bound water. The amount of this material is directly related to the fuel sulfur content.

    The use of B100 decreases the solid carbon fraction of particulate matter (since the oxygen in B100 enables more complete combustion to CO2), eliminates the sulfate fraction (as there is no sulfur in the fuel), while the soluble, or hydrocarbon, fraction stays the same or is increased. Therefore, B100 works well with new technologies such as catalysts (which reduces the soluble fraction of diesel particulate but not the solid carbon fraction), particulate traps, and exhaust gas recirculation (potentially longer engine life due to less carbon).

    Health Effects
    Evidence does exist which indicates that diesel particulate matter is a potential carcinogen. In 1988, the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended that whole diesel exhaust be regarded as "a potential occupational carcinogen", as defined in the Cancer Policy of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The use of B100 does result in decreases in most regulated emissions. Relative to health effects, research results indicate that particulate matter, specifically the carbon or insoluble fraction, is significantly reduced. In addition to reducing the overall levels of pollutants and carbon, the compounds that are prevalent in B100 and diesel fuel exhaust are different. Preliminary research on the speciation of diesel and B100 particulate indicates that B100 exhaust has less harmful impacts on human health than petrodiesel.

    The United States Bureau of Mines (USBOM) has completed Ames mutagenicity testing of the diesel particulate matter (DPM) and exhaust gases from engines fueled with B100 to better understand how the use of B100 may impact the health of miners. Samples were taken from the exhaust of a Caterpillar 3304 PCNA equipped with an exhaust catalyst. Test results documented that the use of B100 reduced the Ames mutagenicity of DPM by 50% over conventional diesel fuel. In addition, the gas phase mutagenicity of B100 was negligible. USBOM researchers believed the strong reduction in mutagenicity may be due to the lack of aromatics or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's) in the B100 fuel and, subsequently, in the exhaust gases. Tests from Europe confirm the reduction in DPM PAH using B100 blends as outlined below:

    Table 4. Gaseous PAH levels of diesel fuel and a 50% B100 blend.

    Diesel

    50% B100

    -- µg/cycle --

    Naphthalene

    331,654

    384

    Methyl-2 Naphthalene

    10,289

    329

    Fluorene

    1,864

    368

    Anthracne

    4,301

    873

    Lubricity
    With the low-sulfur, low aromatic diesel fuel emerging on the market, fleet operators began to encounter premature wear and/or failure of injector pumps in increasing numbers.

    Stanadyne Diesel Systems on October 15, 1993 and Bosch Diesel Fuel Injection Service on December 3, 1993 issued Service Letters to distributors and dealers concerning the lack of lubricity caused by hydroprocessing to reduce the sulfur content in the new low-sulfur diesel. The pump manufacturers recommended use of lubricity additives to alleviate the serious damage occurring to their injection pumps.

    Testing at labs such as Southwest Research Institute, Stanadyne Automotive, and Engineering Testing Services has demonstrated that B100 shows significant lubricity improvement compared to diesel fuel. Two methods of analysis were utilized; the "Scuffing Load Ball On Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator" and the high frequency rotating rig (HFRR).

    Table 5. Lubricity Results of B100 and Petroleum Diesel Using High Frequency Reciprocating Rig*

    Percent B100
    with Petroleum

    Petroleum Diesel
    HFRR, Scar (mm)

    0.00%

    671

    0.20%

    669

    0.30%

    703

    0.40%

    649

    0.50%

    574

    0.75%

    510

    1.00%

    500

    2.00%

    355

    10.0%

    347

    20.0%

    318

    100%

    315

    Tests performed by Stanadyne Automotive
    HFRR Testing, 60° C at 50% Relative Humidity

    Table 6. Lubricity Results using Scuffing Load Ball on Cylinder Lubricity Evaluation, (SLBOCLE)*

    Percent B100
    with Petroleum

    Petroleum Diesel
    BOCLE (grams)

    0.00%

    2200

    0.10%

    2750

    0.20%

    3450

    0.30%

    3200

    0.40%

    3500

    1.00%

    3200

    10.0%

    6000

    20.0%

    6000

    100%

    6000

    Tests performed by Engineering Testing Services

    Flash Point and Sulfur Content
    The flash point of a fuel is defined as the temperature to which the fuel must be heated to produce a mixture that will ignite when exposed to a spark or flame. If the flash point of a fuel is too low, the fuel is considered a fire hazard which is prone to flashing, possible ignition, and even explosion. The flash point of B100 has been tested and reported by various sources. Specific testing at Southwest Research Institute concluded that the flash point of B100 blends increases as the percentage of B100 increases. Therefore pure B100 or blends of B100 with petroleum diesel is safer to store, handle, and use than conventional diesel fuel. In addition, pure B100 is essentially sulfur free and results in a total reduction of SO2 emissions as well sulfate aerosols in particulate matter. These reductions should assist in increasing both vehicle and catalyst life over time.

    Neat B100 has a flash point over 148°C, well above the flash point of conventional diesel fuel. Detailed below are the results from research for the flash point of B100 and B100 blends:

    Table 7.

    BLEND DESCRIPTION FLASH POINT (0C)

    100% Diesel Fuel (low sulphur)

    77.2

    B25

    82.8

    B50

    90.0

    B75

    134.0

    Neat B100

    148.0

    The diesel fuel, B25, and B50 were testing using the ASTM D93 Pensky-Martens closed cup method. The B100 blend containing 75% and 100% B100 did not flash using D93, therefore ASTM D92, the Cleveland open cup method, was used. The flash point of B100 blends increase and the percentage of B100 added increases. Other tests have confirmed this data and suggest that most of the flash point benefits occur at blends levels of 85% and greater.

    B100
    PO BOX 44
    Klemzig  SA  5087
    Ph. 0411 578 425
  • Revised 20041120