IN URBAN TRANSIT VEHICLES![]()
INTRODUCTION
Information collected during assessment of the urban bus market overseas indicated that new clean air regulations would create a marketing opportunity for B100 blends. Economic work completed by the market research firm, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, supported the conclusion that B100 blends (in B20 form (20% B100 mixed with 80% petroleum diesel)) were competitive with other alternative fuels that transit companies may consider. Other research was completed to verify that emissions reductions could be achieved and engine performance was similar to diesel. Because B100 is the only alternative fuel that can be tested prior to conversion, a series of short-term demonstrations with transit operators throughout the U.S. were conducted. Surveys with transit property officials about their intentions to use B100 resulted in approximately 20 percent said they consider B100 the top alternative fuel choice and approximately 50 percent were impressed with the prospects for B100. The US EPA has certified a 20% blend of B100 used in conjunction with an oxidation catalyst as a compliance tool to meet new clean air regulations in the U.S.. WHAT IS B100?
Table 1. B100 Specifications (as of July, 2000).
RATIOS IN URBAN TRANSIT VEHICLES Blend Ratio: minimum 19 percent and maximum 21 percent by volume B100.
Table 2.
FLEET ECONOMIC AND PERFORMANCE A study completed by the University of Georgia provided a cost comparison for operating a transit fleet on three different alternative fuels (B100 blends, compressed natural gas, and methanol). Utilizing a 5% discount rate, the present value per bus per mile was calculated for the total cost of a transit fleet over an expected 30 year life cycle. Diesel buses had the lowest cost per mile (24.7¢). Costs for B100 blends ranged from 37.5 to 42¢ per mile. Compressed natural gas costs varied from 37.5 to 42 cents per mile, while methanol’s cost was 73.6¢ per mile. This study indicated that B100 blends have the potential to compete with CNG and methanol as fuels for urban fleets. Similar conclusions have been reached by urban transit managers. Bi-State Development Agency is the transit authority in the City of St. Louis, MO which operates over 700 buses that consume over 22.7 million litres of diesel fuel annually. Lyle Howard, Quality Assurance Manager for Bi-State, has documented the advantages and disadvantages of various alternative fuels. Bi-State has used B20 for two years in a documented research program. Conclusions from that work include: Mr. Howard compared alternative fuels on the following evaluation criteria; vehicle cost, infrastructure cost, safety, operating cost, reliability, customer acceptance, funding assistance, training costs, fuel availability, fuel quality, and fuel price stability. Fuels were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being most desirable. The following table compares B20 with diesel fuel, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, methanol, and ethanol. Table 3.
Vehicle Performance
CONSIDERATIONS FOR B100 USE
Materials Compatibility
Cold Flow Properties
B100 ATTRIBUTES
The first component, and the one most closely related to the visible smoke often associated with diesel exhaust, is the carbonaceous material. This material is in the form of sub-micron sized carbon particles which are formed during the diesel combustion process and is especially prevalent under conditions when the fuel-air ratio is overly rich. This can occur as a result of insufficient combustion air, overfueling or poor in-cylinder fuel-air mixing. The second component is hydrocarbon material which is absorbed on the carbon particles, commonly referred to as the soluble fraction. A portion of this material is the result of incomplete combustion of the fuel, and the remainder is derived from the engine lube oil. Finally, the third particulate component is comprised of sulfates and bound water. The amount of this material is directly related to the fuel sulfur content. The use of B100 decreases the solid carbon fraction of particulate matter (since the oxygen in B100 enables more complete combustion to CO2), eliminates the sulfate fraction (as there is no sulfur in the fuel), while the soluble, or hydrocarbon, fraction stays the same or is increased. Therefore, B100 works well with new technologies such as catalysts (which reduces the soluble fraction of diesel particulate but not the solid carbon fraction), particulate traps, and exhaust gas recirculation (potentially longer engine life due to less carbon). Health Effects
The United States Bureau of Mines (USBOM) has completed Ames mutagenicity testing of the diesel particulate matter (DPM) and exhaust gases from engines fueled with B100 to better understand how the use of B100 may impact the health of miners. Samples were taken from the exhaust of a Caterpillar 3304 PCNA equipped with an exhaust catalyst. Test results documented that the use of B100 reduced the Ames mutagenicity of DPM by 50% over conventional diesel fuel. In addition, the gas phase mutagenicity of B100 was negligible. USBOM researchers believed the strong reduction in mutagenicity may be due to the lack of aromatics or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's) in the B100 fuel and, subsequently, in the exhaust gases. Tests from Europe confirm the reduction in DPM PAH using B100 blends as outlined below: Table 4. Gaseous PAH levels of diesel fuel and a 50% B100 blend.
Lubricity
Stanadyne Diesel Systems on October 15, 1993 and Bosch Diesel Fuel Injection Service on December 3, 1993 issued Service Letters to distributors and dealers concerning the lack of lubricity caused by hydroprocessing to reduce the sulfur content in the new low-sulfur diesel. The pump manufacturers recommended use of lubricity additives to alleviate the serious damage occurring to their injection pumps. Testing at labs such as Southwest Research Institute, Stanadyne Automotive, and Engineering Testing Services has demonstrated that B100 shows significant lubricity improvement compared to diesel fuel. Two methods of analysis were utilized; the "Scuffing Load Ball On Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator" and the high frequency rotating rig (HFRR). Table 5. Lubricity Results of B100 and Petroleum Diesel Using High Frequency Reciprocating Rig*
Table 6. Lubricity Results using Scuffing Load Ball on Cylinder Lubricity Evaluation, (SLBOCLE)*
Flash Point and Sulfur Content
Neat B100 has a flash point over 148°C, well above the flash point of conventional diesel fuel. Detailed below are the results from research for the flash point of B100 and B100 blends: Table 7.
The diesel fuel, B25, and B50 were testing using the ASTM D93 Pensky-Martens closed cup method. The B100 blend containing 75% and 100% B100 did not flash using D93, therefore ASTM D92, the Cleveland open cup method, was used. The flash point of B100 blends increase and the percentage of B100 added increases. Other tests have confirmed this data and suggest that most of the flash point benefits occur at blends levels of 85% and greater.
PO BOX 44 Klemzig SA 5087 Ph. 0411 578 425 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revised 20041120